Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: walford

Just wondering. I understand the difference between being charged with a crime, and being convicted in a court of law.

But have noticed that many news people report as fact that Darren Wilson shot Michael Brown, without the qualifier that it was an alleged shooting. Whereas in other cases, they are always careful to say something “allegedly” happened.


10 posted on 10/23/2014 8:29:25 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego

“...many news people report as fact that Darren Wilson shot Michael Brown, without the qualifier that it was an alleged shooting.”


In the case of Ferguson PD Officer Darren Wilson, there is no disagreement that he shot Michael Brown, so he is not an “alleged” shooter. The disagreement is whether the shooting was justified.

Given that he has not been indicted, it is not even appropriate for him to be called an “alleged murderer.” But those who are disposed to judge by race rather than evidence are indeed saying the Officer Wilson is a murderer and not even using the word “alleged.”


15 posted on 10/23/2014 8:36:20 AM PDT by walford (https://www.facebook.com/wralford [feel free to friend me] @wralford on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson