Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tbw2

Not necessarily. I do genealogical searches and I am amazed at the number of families during that time who would easily have eight to twelve children, most of which grew to adulthood.


16 posted on 10/23/2014 8:18:31 AM PDT by Slyfox (To put on the mind of George Washington read all of Deuteronomy 28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Slyfox

I also do a LOT of genealogy. When women married a second time it was usually because the first husband died in a work-related death or as a soldier.

In contrast, many women died in childbirth. Having younger siblings always created the risk that the earlier children would lose their mother. Many times widowers left with young children married a second time to have someone raise the first batch, and also to create a few more.

Of course, both sexes die of disease. In any case, bIology dictates it is far more common for men to have lots of children, and often well past 50.


19 posted on 10/23/2014 8:52:24 AM PDT by StayAt HomeMother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson