Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

“Lewinsky gave her first public speech on Monday”

Didn’t she speak up about 10 years ago? On her own?


2 posted on 10/23/2014 6:18:22 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DBrow

Yea but that’s not today’s truth.


7 posted on 10/23/2014 6:26:11 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart ("Refusing to vote against unprincipled people made Obama President. " - agere_contra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow

This is Lewinksy version 3.0.

The deal here is that her general life is ruined. Typically, if this had not occurred....the intern and the political game player would have gone on for two or three decades. A plain Senator or Representative would have hired them up as office support, eventually in six years making them a full manager and ensuring their $100k a year salary.

She would have traveled around with her man (political figure), while the wife sat back home. She’d sip wine in the room with him....discuss politics....and been the perfect liaison gal for a busy guy who needs a wife and a mistress.

Somewhere around age thirty-five, Monica would have discovered that there’s no truth to her guy divorcing his wife, and there’s no family option, or plan B. She’d either pack up and go back to college, find another man, or just accept this for the remainder of her life.

In this present case, I think Monica is still hooked on Bill Clinton and his amazing character. Once introduced at a party....she’s pretty much damaged goods and never able to get a guy to look at her beyond being Bill’s intern. I can understand her frustrations....but there’s no chapter two to this book or story. It just lingers, unless Bill divorces Hillary, and then something might occur.


8 posted on 10/23/2014 6:27:49 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow

She was yakking it up only a couple of months ago - in Vanity Fair, I think.

I have no idea why this woman can’t get on with her life - she’s still talking about her great love affair - instead of acknowledging the embarrassing charade it really was. She’s gotten more pathetic, if possible. And I used to have sympathy for her.


53 posted on 10/23/2014 7:54:14 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard III: Loyalty Binds Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow

I have felt sorry for her - especially since she was young and Clinton used her, but this latest appearance really bothers me. She lost her private life not directly because of Matt Drudge, but because she got involved with probably the most public figure in the country at the time. Further, she still seems to be carrying water for him. Did she not read what he said when asked why he did it and stated “because I could”? To his credit, Clinton himself admitted that what he did was “reprehensible”. She doesn’t have to protect him.

If she had said that she was young, made bad decisions, and was influenced in a hurtful and selfish manner by a very senior and powerful man, it would have been accurate, and people would understand. I don’t really understand what she is thinking.


57 posted on 10/23/2014 8:08:50 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson