To: dennisw
A lot of posters are arguing factual questions here. The Supreme Court does not argue facts. The facts were stipulated to in the briefs. And here, the stipulated fact was that the criminal did NOT know he was using a real person’s ID.
29 posted on
10/21/2014 6:23:40 AM PDT by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: Opinionated Blowhard
A lot of posters are arguing factual questions here. The Supreme Court does not argue facts. The facts were stipulated to in the briefs. And here, the stipulated fact was that the criminal did NOT know he was using a real person’s ID.So maybe just maybe the Eric Holder Justice Dept threw this case. Bungled it on purpose by so stipulating
37 posted on
10/21/2014 6:26:45 AM PDT by
dennisw
(The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson