I though Eric withHolder rules that felons everywhere could vote for President, as long as it was for the Democratic candidate?
Holder wants the Court to rule that way, but no such right exists or should exists. What's funny is seeing a whole bunch of self-professed conservatives taking up Holder's mantle of felon's rights, just because this particular issue concerns guns. This is a legal nose under the camel's tent -- once felons have a right to guns then they can use this as precedent to win "rights" to everything else. However the Constitution is clear -- you can lose ALL rights if you're convicted of a crime. That's stated pretty plainly in the 5th Amendment.