[exDemMom]

If I have said *anything* that is incorrect, you are completely free to post the correct information, with references.

Everything I have said is based in the scientific literature. The fact that the experts who have to make public statements base those statements on the exact same body of literature is why we all seem to be saying the same message.

If I am lying, then there is a truth against which to compare the lies. Either produce the evidence that I am lying, or stop calling me a liar.

[Prophet2520]

Lie 1 Whale.to is not a valid scientific site and has no legitimate information about vaccine safety. Lie 2 I do know that anti-vax activists rarely use real science when advocating against vaccine use. Lie 3 The problem with whale.to and its ilk are that they “cherry pick” from real scientific literature in order to “prove” whatever their anti-vax screed is saying. Lie 4 They take facts out of context. Lie 5 There is the one side that does the research, gathers data, analyzes and publishes it, and compiles the data to come up with the best evidence-based practices and recommendations. Then there is the side that will say anything, flavors lies with a touch of facts, does no research, and does its best to convince people not to use vaccines. Lie 6 No one who thinks that anti-vax sites provide genuine information is worth reading, "Either produce the evidence that I am lying, or stop calling me a liar. ... I’m not going to bother with reading your screed." Hopeless