Whale.to is not a valid scientific site and has no legitimate information about vaccine safety.
I can't pretend to know the motivation of anti-vaxxers--maybe they think the earth is overpopulated, so are trying to turn people away from vaccine use as an indirect way to kill people. However, I do know that anti-vax activists rarely use real science when advocating against vaccine use.
Vaccines are a medical wonder, and have saved the lives of countless millions.
How many books have you read from “anti-vax” writers? Or are you just ranting about something when you have NO idea what the other side says, and you have formed a firm opinion without without due investigation.
“Whale.to is not a valid scientific site and has no legitimate information about vaccine safety. “
So are you alleging the deaths cited there from the Salk vaccine are false, or that you just don’t care if people die? Are you also suggesting that Black_Agnes is lying about the people she knew who got severely ill?
Of course it is not a “scientific cite” is quotes medical journals, government reports and doctors. Are you denying all those quotes and references? Try this one from the British Medical Journal http://www.bmj.com/content/2/4669
If you sign up you can verify the quote.
“The statistics collected in this inquiry reveal clearly an association between recent injections and paralysis . . . We must conclude that in the 1949 epidemic of poliomyelitis in this country, cases of paralysis were occurring which were associated with inoculation procedures carried out within the month preceding the record date of onset of the illness . . .” (Reported in the British Medical Journal, July 1, 1950)
It also references Lancet and other science/medical journals, or are you denying those are science journals?