To: Kaslin
What would be interesting is for Apple or Google to one-up the Feds and make it not only encrypt by default, but to also wipe by default if a “wipe” password is used. In other words, you’d have two passwords. The one you use when you want to use your phone, and one to give to the government when it is prying into your life.
55 posted on
10/19/2014 5:42:35 PM PDT by
zeugma
(The act of observing disturbs the observed.)
To: zeugma
57 posted on
10/19/2014 5:45:06 PM PDT by
Balding_Eagle
(If America falls, darkness will cover the earth for a thousand years.)
To: zeugma
What would be interesting is for Apple or Google to one-up the Feds and make it not only encrypt by default, but to also wipe by default if a wipe password is used. In other words, youd have two passwords. The one you use when you want to use your phone, and one to give to the government when it is prying into your life. Any competent investigator is going to start by copying the encrypted data and working on the copy, in order to overcome that tactic.
85 posted on
10/20/2014 7:17:15 AM PDT by
e-gadfly
To: zeugma
Addendum: Some crypto systems (such as the defunct TrueCrypt project and its current successors
VeraCrypt and
CipherShed) have a "plausible deniability" arrangement -- you can set up an encrypted volume with two passwords, which reveal two different sets of contents (one decoy and one real).
86 posted on
10/20/2014 7:19:46 AM PDT by
e-gadfly
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson