To: Sherman Logan
You have the technological point correct, the files are (claimed to be) inaccessible even with a warrant. Current practice is to seize the phone, and send it to Apple with a copy of the signed warrant. Pursuant to the warrant, Apple gives unencrypted phone contents to the police.
What Apple is claiming is that it will lock itself out of that capability.
11 posted on
10/19/2014 1:00:44 PM PDT by
Cboldt
To: Cboldt
You have the technological point correct, the files are (claimed to be) inaccessible even with a warrant. Current practice is to seize the phone, and send it to Apple with a copy of the signed warrant. Pursuant to the warrant, Apple gives unencrypted phone contents to the police. What Apple is claiming is that it will lock itself out of that capability. Or perhaps claim it has, while secretly giving the government the ability.
27 posted on
10/19/2014 1:32:47 PM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
To: Cboldt
Apple doesn’t own the device.
The device is the personal property of the person who paid for it and owns it.
They have zero right or obligation to break into anyone’s private property.
67 posted on
10/20/2014 2:20:44 AM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson