Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
You have the technological point correct, the files are (claimed to be) inaccessible even with a warrant. Current practice is to seize the phone, and send it to Apple with a copy of the signed warrant. Pursuant to the warrant, Apple gives unencrypted phone contents to the police.

What Apple is claiming is that it will lock itself out of that capability.

11 posted on 10/19/2014 1:00:44 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
You have the technological point correct, the files are (claimed to be) inaccessible even with a warrant. Current practice is to seize the phone, and send it to Apple with a copy of the signed warrant. Pursuant to the warrant, Apple gives unencrypted phone contents to the police. What Apple is claiming is that it will lock itself out of that capability.

Or perhaps claim it has, while secretly giving the government the ability.

27 posted on 10/19/2014 1:32:47 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt

Apple doesn’t own the device.

The device is the personal property of the person who paid for it and owns it.

They have zero right or obligation to break into anyone’s private property.


67 posted on 10/20/2014 2:20:44 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson