What an individual does at the voting booth has consequences and no amount of “I’t’s not my fault” can escape reality of who is now in charge and who occupies the white house. Only those who failed to vote, or cast the protest vote for the candidate destined to lose, but nevertheless the anointed and so called “principled” candidate should bear the burden of the world so many of us didn’t ask for but now have to live with.
So who is worse, the ones we know are the enemy, or the ones we believe gave us the enemy in protest of perceived wrongs committed by the R party.
The problem is you don’t know your enemy.
Is that a serious question? Do you think the people who aren't persuaded to your point of view are worse than your open enemy (which I assume is the DEM party, in general)? A better approach is to increase the number of allies (at least not increase the number of enemies), but your approach appears to turn the passive into enemies. You aren't Mitch McConnell, by chance?