To: Hot Tabasco
We would be better served by testing and observation. If he’s not sick, chances are there’s no point in killing the poor thing.
23 posted on
10/16/2014 4:02:43 PM PDT by
CorporateStepsister
(I am NOT going to force a man to make my dreams come true)
To: CorporateStepsister
If he’s not sick, chances are there’s no point in killing the poor thing
I think I explained myself in post #26........
This is all BS, the CDC has no idea what they are doing..........
29 posted on
10/16/2014 4:06:37 PM PDT by
Hot Tabasco
(Don't harsh my buzz homie......)
To: CorporateStepsister
The dogs do not “get sick”.
As for the tests, there are many false negatives, and apparently tests need to be doubled but spread apart significantly.
That is alot of quarantine time and effort.
31 posted on
10/16/2014 4:40:21 PM PDT by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson