This is just the situation where the founders would have us resisting *with* arms. *
It sounds like she wants the tree of Liberty to be watered.
Don't fall for it. Washington is licking their chops wanting to goad us into armed rebellion against their unConstitutional ways so they can lock us up.
Maybe churches should give up their tax free status if that's necessary and blast away every Sunday full force against the tyranny
Don't fall for it. Washington is licking their chops wanting to goad us into armed rebellion against their unConstitutional ways so they can lock us up.
I disagree on two counts.
First, the Bundy Ranch episode demonstrates that things haven't yet gone so far that they are willing to go after armed and determined patriots as they did with defenseless kooks in WACO.
Second, if the goal is indeed to goad us into rebellion so they start locking up large numbers of resistors to unconstitutional edicts, then balls to the walls resistance & confrontation is better sooner than later. Because it is certain that it will come later, likely when we are less capable of resistance.
The reason for my view on #2 is simple. History has shown many times that the longer bullies and aggressors are allowed to keep pushing without [serious] repercussions, the less likely they are to believe the victims really mean it when they finally say "enough, now we fight". The result then escalates far beyond what would have occurred had victims fought back much sooner.
These fascists are not going to get weaker or less inclined to commit these atrocities. Just the opposite. The only thing a bully truly understands is getting punched out. Obola has done a very good job of proving that with his appeasement oriented foreign policy.