Why did Bush let the liberals accuse him of lying, when he could have proved them wrong at any time?
adults vs children?
the left is still in diapers.
Perhaps he wasn't informed either.
The only theory I’ve heard is that they date from 1991, and would represent an inactive program. No, it doesn’t make sense to me either.
Talking about it can put you in federal prison for 20 years. Weapons sales are nasty business. Just ask the souls from the USS Poet.
Why did Bush let the liberals accuse him of lying, when he could have proved them wrong at any time?Karl Rove's "new tone"?
Very hard to understand.
Because there is one political party, has been since at least Ronaldus left office and most people refuse to believe it because they would feel stupid.
In 2003 US satellites watched 11 RUSSIAN trucks move the main stockpile out of Iraq into Syria. The war colleges gamed out the entire confrontation with RUSSIA over their WMDs and the end game was thermo-nuclear war between the US and RUSSIA.
The CIA bolted on to the MSM hate spew of Bush, Cheney, Republicans, conservatives, and made up the "Oops, were were wrong" line knowing that the revengeful, hating, 2-dimensional thinkers would slurp it up, still are.
Better to take the hit than thermo-nuke war and everyone dies.
My guess: We continued to find more stockpiles as the occupation persisted, and we didn't want those weapons to fall into the hands of the enemy (or the enemy to use them against us). The liberals in their false accusations perhaps convinced the enemy that these weapons didn't exist or at least partially inhibited the inclinations of the enemy to seek, capture, and use the weapons.
I don't doubt also that more chemical and/or biological weapons exist than even now are publicly acknowledged, perhaps rather many not yet uncovered. And yes, I suspect that the easily mobile ones went to Syrian Arab Republic, where no one on our side really now knows who captured or controls or hid them.