Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tanknetter

It wouldn’t matter what the counter-story would have been to Bush’s claim that there were WMDs.

It’s the same with any political issue; abortion, for example. They have their points and we have our points and the debate rages. But at least there’s a debate.

Pres Bush’s supporters would not have stood on the sidelines saying “oh my, they have points, so we better not repeat our own being advocated by our leader.”

We would have shouted from the housetops, AND we would have won the hearts and minds of many Americans who were 100% behind the president at the outset of this war and would have at least acknowledged a debate was raging with facts on our side.

But, Pres Bush chose NOT to argue at all. He gave ZERO information on these WMDs to his supporters and potential supporters. It was his biggest FAIL. He owns it.


59 posted on 10/15/2014 6:15:39 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

Bush does NOT own this.

These weapons were widely reported. The NYT reported on them and said they were old and not the stockpiles Bush had claimed was there.

My guess is that ISIS is using these now and the NYT is spinning to cover Obama and their own butts.


99 posted on 10/15/2014 7:12:40 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson