I love liberals, now claiming that Bush lied because Saddam didn’t have a working WMD program and the WMDs were old... As if getting shelled with chemical weapons built in 1991 would end up with a different result than if you got shelled with chemical weapons built in 2001.
And then there’s that little thing about those UN Sanctions where Saddam wasn’t supposed to have a single WMD.
They are playing fast and loose with the facts NYRep. I agree with you. My sense is that a loaded, weaponized old sarin gas artillery round or missile is still deadly.