To: ironman
May I summarize this NYT junk: Bush’s and America’s fault.
Key example:
“The United States had gone to war declaring it must destroy an active weapons of mass destruction program. Instead, American troops gradually found and ultimately suffered from the remnants of long-abandoned programs, built in close collaboration with the West.”
PS The “West” is NYT code speak for GW and the USA.
19 posted on
10/14/2014 10:29:57 PM PDT by
piytar
(So....you are saying that Hilllary (and Obama) do not know what the meaning of the word "IS" IS?)
To: piytar
And yes, these azzhats are still obsessing over GW Bush...
20 posted on
10/14/2014 10:32:23 PM PDT by
piytar
(So....you are saying that Hilllary (and Obama) do not know what the meaning of the word "IS" IS?)
To: piytar
The fact that there were medical consequences to handling those munitions indicates that their contents could have been placed in other shells and used. So the fact that they were old is of no significance. He had chemical weapons.
29 posted on
10/15/2014 12:08:37 AM PDT by
ArmstedFragg
(Hoaxey Dopey Changey)
To: piytar
PS The “West” is NYT code speak for GW and the USA. They know that is how readers will interpret that even though European countries supplied most of Iraq's weapons and military infrastructure.
56 posted on
10/15/2014 5:55:46 AM PDT by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson