Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rfreedom4u

Are they trying to imply that pastors cannot speak against the ordinance??


24 posted on 10/14/2014 10:00:24 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GeronL

Since the ordinance is not a ballot issue, how can their speech be limited? It is not “campaigning”.


39 posted on 10/14/2014 10:14:42 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Hey Obama: If Islamic State is not Islamic, then why did you give Osama Bin Laden a muslim funeral?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL

CRUCIFY HIM!!!!


45 posted on 10/14/2014 10:16:25 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL

It’s called “jamming.” The homosexuals publicly shame and humiliate anyone who disagrees with them in such a destructive manner that no one else will disagree with them in public again. If anyone comes to the pastors’ defense, they will get the same treatment.

The legal case is largely irrelevant. By the time the LGB*&%&& are done with these pastors, few people will feel comfortable saying they attend their churches.

Its the same thing the libs have done to Sarah Palin.

The only defense is courage.


94 posted on 10/14/2014 8:29:15 PM PDT by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson