So — the CDC director was “arguing from ignorance” when he said that there was a breach of procedure.
He doesn’t know that there was a breach of protocols, he’s just inferring “there must have been”, and inferring incorrectly because he doesn’t know what the real route of the nurse’s infection.
And so the CDC director blames the nurse, in effect, and in so doing also lies to the American people, by implying that he “knows” that the protocols are adequate and any infection must have been caused by not following them.
Tell me, on that basis, why a nurse would wish to risk her life by performing the nursing services she did supply?
By the way, did the nurse volunteer? Or was she directed by her superiors to perform the risky services?