I am serious. We have a mismashcl of laws that conflict and don’t make sense because of PC/liberalism/progressivism and the Cult of Fairness claque.
What we had up until the ICC was very clear private property rights and a better, though imperfect, understanding of Constitutional boundaries for government.
To me there isn’t a conflict between a property owner telling you to keep your gun out and a property owner telling you that she won’t make your cake, serve your food, or do business with you. It’s the same thinking behind not forcing you to join a union or buy Democratcare or any product.
I don’t believe that because a business works with the “public” that it is a public entity akin to government. Rosa Parks took the bus for years without problems when the bus company was private. Money is money after all. When the municipality took over bus service is when she was discriminated against. We need to return to the Lochner Era of freedom and I’d like to get back to pre-ICC years.
Ranting about how things oughtta be is not a serious answer to my question.