You’ve called an end to the conservative movement for the sake of imprisoning users of disapproved plant matter ... good choice.
Nope, never called for such a thing.
You have shown that pro-pot legalization advocates are narrow in their thinking regarding the impact of legalizing another drug. At least drug companies list all possible risks to people who may take their drug while pro-pot legalization advocates focus only on the positive.
By that 'logic,' no change should ever be made - including, for just one example, the dismantling of the welfare state. You've called an end to the conservative movement for the sake of imprisoning users of disapproved plant matter ... good choice.
Nope, never called for such a thing.
Sure you did - you told us that given that humans are fallible, it's naive to not expect the worst from the dismantling of the welfare state or from any other change to the liberal status quo.
You have shown that pro-pot legalization advocates are narrow in their thinking regarding the impact of legalizing another drug. At least drug companies list all possible risks to people who may take their drug while pro-pot legalization advocates focus only on the positive.
Your "possible risk" is the illogical fear that many people responsible enough to avoid pot when it's illegal will suddenly become irresponsible enough to not only use pot but render themselves unemployable (whether through employer testing or stupefaction) when it's legal.