One little thing you’ve missed.
Congress has not declared war. This executive has not followed the law as prescribed by the constitution.
It will go before the supreme court and the American people will win. A federal judge has already ruled so, it will be the SC upholding this decision.
No, I didn't miss it — that decision is from WWI, but it's the you can't yell fire in a crowded
decision… meaning it's been used as precedent for plenty of non-war infringements.
This executive has not followed the law as prescribed by the constitution.
No, they haven't.
But then again the War on Drugs is effectively the War on The Bill of Rights. (Link to an enumeration I wrote up; 9 of the 10 have been damaged by the War on Drugs.)
And the War on Terror is a convenient excuse to reduce privacy to nothing.
If they were to declare war, it'd be on us.
It will go before the supreme court and the American people will win. A federal judge has already ruled so, it will be the SC upholding this decision.
I think you place too much faith in the USSC — there's four citations of USSC cases in that enumeration post, and that's barely scratching the surface.