“But if they are infected it would be hard to hide that forever.”
That’s true, but it’s only necessary to hide it through the elections. Early voting is getting ready to start. A widespread panic would negatively effect the rats chances...
“That’s true, but it’s only necessary to hide it through the elections. Early voting is getting ready to start. A widespread panic would negatively effect the rats chances...”
But they are certainly trying — spinning and lying.
See article posted by maggief:
CDC chief on second Ebola case: There was a breach in protocol
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3214207/posts
“The head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said there was “clearly” a breach in protocol that led to a Texas health care worker contracting Ebola after treating a Liberian man who later died from the virus, although authorities do not yet know what that breach was. “
If they don’t know what the breach was, there is no way to know whether or not there was a breach. This is just more spin and lies to lull people into a false sense of security.
That is possible, but they would have to hide the secondaries and so on. They would not be able to look for them openly. Or they simply forget about all the secondary contacts and let it spread and blow wide open after the election. All of those scenarios are far fetched.