Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kazan
>> Seriously, what would republican control of the senate gain us?
>
> That you even have to ask the question is mind boggling.

No — I'm asking about their character.
What characteristic in some politician with an (R) by their name is it that separates them from Democrats? (i.e. what is the functional difference?)

Do you realize that RADICAL LEFT-WING JUDGES ARE BEING APPOINTED via the nuclear option by Harry Reid and the Democrats, judges that were being blocked by Republicans? Those judges are going to be on the court longer than Thad Cochran and Pat Roberts are going to be alive.

No, they weren't — Take a look at the history of Romney for some of the more egregious ones.
Much of the Judiciary's problems are not new — in fact, its state now shows your they were blocking radical judges to be… rather unfounded.

And, leftist judges are overturning conservative legislation at the state level -- voter ID laws, pro-life laws and laws cracking down on the illegal immigration.

And what have the republicans been doing to ensure the integrity of the vote? What have they done with illegal immigration?
Hell, the invasion is an excellent example of the BS the Republican party feeds you:

TX Constitution, ART 4, Sec. 7. COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF OF MILITARY FORCES; CALLING FORTH MILITIA.
He shall be Commander-in-Chief of the military forces of the State, except when they are called into actual service of the United States. He shall have power to call forth the militia to execute the laws of the State, to suppress insurrections, and to repel invasions.
There, right there is the legal justification for using military power to slam shut the illegal immigration. But did Perry do that? No! Instead he called the TX National Guard up for a stupid display purposes only-mission that looked like a good photo-op. —— And many people here were lapping it up saying That's Presidential!

What a load of shit.

People like you are destroying anything that can be accomplished the future by conservatives.

Yes, because I'm so important and influential; hell, I'm the face of the conservative movement. <-- Sarcasm.

Why not just drop out of the political discussion and plan secession or a civil war. Those are the only options you're leaving conservatives with.

If that's what valuing justice and constitutionality lead to, so be it.
You continue your course of the lesser evil and let me know how great you do in advancing conservative causes.

“In any compromise between food and poison, it is only death that can win. In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit.”
— Ayn Rand

187 posted on 10/11/2014 5:20:56 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]


To: OneWingedShark
What characteristic in some politician with an (R) by their name is it that separates them from Democrats? (i.e. what is the functional difference?)

It's beyond belief that you even have to ask the question.

There is certainly is huge difference between all Republicans and all Democrats on Obamacare. Because all Republicans voted against and all or most Democrats voted for it.

The difference combating Islamic terrorism and defending the nation from it couldn't be greater than between Obama and Bush.

The difference between Elena Kagan and Samuel Alito couldn't be greater.No, they weren't — Take a look at the history of Romney for some of the more egregious ones.

He would have nominated more conservative ones as President because he would have been elected by a more conservative base. Any judges he would have appointed would have been far more conservative than ones Obama did.

You're making points that are even remotely true. The last six years has proven there is huge difference between Republicans and Democrats.

203 posted on 10/11/2014 11:44:52 PM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

To: OneWingedShark
You continue your course of the lesser evil and let me know how great you do in advancing conservative causes.

Voting for the greater of two evils is going to give us communism. Everything from the gun rights and to religious freedom are going to be gone if liberals continue to pack the courts with far left judges.

Voting for the lesser of two evils is called self-preservation. Lying is evil but lying is acceptable if it protects innocent people from harm. The same logic applies to voting for less-than-righteous Republicans over Democrats.

204 posted on 10/11/2014 11:51:54 PM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson