You also assumed something i never said - you assumed that I don’t think there are some risks and some negatives with RINOs in the Senate. That’s stupid. I never said that. I never said anything that would lead a thinking person to think that.
Read. Carefully. Think. Do not ASSume.
I responded to exactly what you wrote. Not my fault your position as a GOPe cheerleader is a tough one.
For this election, the drawbacks of a rino outweigh the drawbacks of a conservative democrat. To prove me wrong you have to list some benefit that will happen with a GOP senate. This has gone round and round and the GOPe side never scores.
Obama is not up for re-election, forcing him to veto does nothing.
Appointees get rubber stamped. Rinos scream, faint and fold in budget battles. Rinos love the media attention they get when they criticize their own party.
The drawbacks are that rinos will use that window to pass “moderate” legislation while giving Dems bipartisan cover. Every rino in office is one more vote for weak/moderate leadership. It is easier to get rid of a red state dem than a rino. The message to the GOPe that Mississippi can never happen again needs to be loud and clear.
I can list lots of problems with more rinos in the senate. Still waiting for any positive beyond pointless showvotes and prom queen / majority leader.