[Ann Archy]

the situation ethic is he’s going to vote for a VILE, EVIL DEMOCRAT in order to help MORE Vile, Evil DEMOCRATS DESTROY our country!!! Totally UNethical!!

[Norm Lenhart]

Really? Removing a corrupt liberal minority leader and replacing them with a comparatively powerless freshman lib is unethical?

Seems like that advances conservatism because it provably takes the greater threat out of a position of power.

[cuban leaf]

the situation ethic is he’s going to vote for a VILE, EVIL DEMOCRAT in order to help MORE Vile, Evil DEMOCRATS DESTROY our country!!! Totally UNethical!!

---

Actually, it’s a pretty typical election cycle. At least she has not been around long enough for her evil to mature as some incombants. ;-)

[INVAR]

the situation ethic is he’s going to vote for a VILE, EVIL DEMOCRAT in order to help MORE Vile, Evil DEMOCRATS DESTROY our country!!! Totally Unethical!!

And how is that any different than your vote for the liberal GOP Ruling Class oligarchs who declared war on Conservatives; vowed to 'crush' us and 'punch us in the nose'???

Your 'situational ethics' are as thin as wet tissue paper because you and your ilk demand everyone vote for the VILE, EVIL ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICAN in order to perpetuate the illusion they are an opposition party when the FACTS SHOW that they only help the MORE vile, evil MarxoFascists destroy the country while punishing and making irrelevant, Conservatives.

Traitors to the cause are as evil as the traitors to the country, and you support traitors.