“Consequently, arguments which are critical of transgenderism on the basis of biology must reconcile the natural examples of biological transgenderism to the transgenderism in Humans in order to be persuasive in the biological realm of discussion.”
Humans are not fish or frogs. Point to me spontaneous changes of men into women who can produce offspring, and I’ll pay attention to you.
“Humans are not fish or frogs. Point to me spontaneous changes of men into women who can produce offspring, and I’ll pay attention to you.”
First, I did not argue any point of view at all in regard to Human transgenderism. The post I replied to referenced natural biology, and I pointed out for the sake of accuracy in the discussion that there are examples of transexuality in the Nature the prior post mentioned.
Second, much of the Natural examples of transgenderism are forms of hemaphoditism, and human hermaphordites are an everyday occurrence in the Human experience. True hermaphrodites have also been known to be capable of successfully giving birth and/or inseminating. many hermaphordites use the men’s and/or the ladies restrooms without any undue notice of the public despite the arrangements of their sexual organs. So, the issue predates present day medical surgical and hormonal transsexual treatments since the beginnings of Humans.