Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cva66snipe
Not quite. POTUS electoral process is quite different. Actually your cast vote can mean zilch.

If you are absolutely sure how your state is going to vote, and it's not to your liking, then it may make sense to vote for the Losertarian or the Constipationalist, or whomever. Your guy might actually break a percent! At least, there would be a number in the returns to shake a stick at.

E.g., the 2000 US Senate race in Massachusetts, in which Libertarian Carla Howell got 11.3% (!), and Republican Jack E. Robinson got 12.23%, Fat Teddy winning, of course, with 69.11%.

But if there's any doubt whatsoever as to the final outcome, then you need to vote for the R, even if he sucks!

484 posted on 10/02/2014 1:42:15 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies ]


To: cynwoody; Norm Lenhart; cva66snipe
Losertarian or the Constipationalist

How interesting that on a board dedicated to Conservatism and the Constitution, we find a cadre of GOP-e party hacks who use derogatories to refer to Conservatives and Constitutionalists in demeaning fashion, which I think, reveals who and what they truly are.

Plants, wolves and agitators.

486 posted on 10/02/2014 1:50:34 AM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson