![](http://i47.tinypic.com/15mn2hx.jpg";;)
Death squads on patrol: a glimpse of what Obamacare will look like when fully implemented.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
Hitler would be proud.
“The mobile euthanasia teams claimed that they would fill the “unmet demand” for euthanasia for people with chronic depression (mental pain), people with disabilities, people with dementia and loneliness, and for those whose request for euthanasia was declined by their physician.”
Positively ghoulish.
Who gets to decide who is “mental”, what defines “mental, and what the prescribed treatment is for a patient that is diagnosed as “mental” in a government operated healthcare system? Surely they would’t exploit if for political reasons would they?....no sarc tag necessary...
And trust me, they are ramping up the “discussion” now. We will see this officially instituted here within two years.
Zeke Emanuel will be pleased that all of these useless people are being prevented from getting to age 75.
Take the pill -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-dQfb8WQvo
you better believe that’s the mindset and goal of the ‘progressives’ and since they can and are adding to ‘b ummer care all the time - easy to slip it in
I’m glad that Boer finally came out against euthanasia, but it may be too late for the poor people of the Netherlands. Too late for the near future, at any rate.
Please note, the government will question your “mental health” if:
1-You deny man made climate change,
2-Fail to support Common Core,
3-Attend a Church or Synagogue more than twice per year,
4-Are Registered Republican,
5-Have ever owned a firearm,
6-Have espoused Pro-Life beliefs,
7-Have ever expressed sympathies with the Tea Party,
8-Have questioned Obama’s leadership abilities,
etc....
I believe the “mobile euthanasia teams” had a different name in Germany: Die Einsatzgruppen.
http://allyoudeliver.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/einsatzgruppen.jpg
DSM will come out with more diagnoses such as oppositional defiant disorder (313.81). Any veteran or stressed out person can be diagnosed with PTSD
The easiest way to get rid of someone is to place them in a mental institution for their own good; no trial is needed. Political opposition will be characterized as a mental disorder. If they don’t “improve”, euthanasia will be necessary to relieve them of their malady.
SOYLENT GREEN IS PEOPLE!!!
The Netherlands suffered mightily under Nazi occupation (1940-1945). So how does the Dutch euthanizing mental health patients differ from that of the Nazis doing the same thing to German mental health patients? I think I see the difference. If the Nazis did it, that was bad. If the Dutch do it, that’s good. I don’t think so, Skippy. This rationalization positively reeks.
Socialists love euthanasia because it promises an easy end to any social problems: just kill the people who you don’t like.
The real zinger is that socialists don’t like anybody who is not both totally compliant and servile, socialist themselves, connected to the elite, and mediocre, that is, neither successful nor a complete failure.
They crave the homogeneity of the sheep herd and even the beehive, both of which they frequently fantasize about in their works of fiction. “Wouldn’t it be great if everyone was just like me?”
So taking this as an axiom, who do socialists want to murder?
1) The very rich, and even the ordinary wealthy. There is tremendous animosity against them, those who socialists believe, are “the winners in life’s lottery”, quoting Dick Gephardt. “Kill the rich”. Excepting the rich, elite socialists.
2) The very poor and the homeless, especially ethnic minorities. Think Margaret Sanger. Those who refuse economic conformity.
3) Those who are not ‘perfect’, physically or mentally, excepting the conditions that socialists frequently suffer from, such as intense neuroses, feelings of inferiority, paranoia and undirected pathological hate.
4) The designated ‘enemies of the state’, who are people who do things socialists do not like and are unrepentant about it. This can include people like smokers, alcoholics, those who eat the wrong foods or too much, not exercising with ‘the group’, those who are accused of consuming or polluting too much. Of course these rules only apply to the ‘hoi polloi’, the common man. Not the elites. “Euthanasia of the smoker and the overweight”, which is done today in England by refusing them surgery or other medicine.
5) Those who are very young, infirm or elderly. Socialists hate those who are *easy* to kill, and can be separated from those who support them. About 30,000 adults are murdered in the UK each year, not including abortions.
6) The Politically Incorrect. Those who oppose the socialist agenda or try to subvert or even mitigate it; or who engage in unapproved behavior, acting on their own initiative or displaying individuality.
7) Whimsical murder. A good way of describing this is with an event that happened in Afghanistan during Taliban rule. A Taliban supporter was bicycling with his wife, who was “properly” attired by Taliban standards. Another Taliban saw them, shot and killed the woman, and shot her husband in the leg. His reason was accepted by the Sharia court, that by “his interpretation of the Koran”, women should not use machines. In other words, whimsical homicide is justified with subjective interpretation. So, if a socialist sees a person he can murder them on the spot, as long as he can later justify that murder with his own interpretation of socialist doctrines.
8) Anyone else, for little or no reason. Serial killers need no excuse.
