Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
Yes, I have narrowed it down to a single individual on freerepublic, Jim Robinson, he considers it already resolved.

From appeal to popularity to appeal to authority in one move.

102 posted on 09/30/2014 7:33:39 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: OneWingedShark

JR doesn’t want you to troll it here but I think he is OK with you doing it elsewhere.

You do respect private ownership don’t you?


103 posted on 09/30/2014 7:37:40 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: OneWingedShark

If you are going through logic 101, then he who asserts must prove. You raised the concern about Ted’s eligibility... but have no proof. The burden is on you.

The quote you provided did not support your stance, and in fact wasn’t even the current version of the law (which also does not support your stance).

So again... what support do you offer for your position?


111 posted on 09/30/2014 9:36:27 PM PDT by csivils
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson