Do you know what Ops Research, Fire Power/Lethality and Threat Assessments are? Do you know specifically what advances have been made in science that have effected weapons technologies? For one example in explosives to make it easy.
Technology effectiveness and readiness are crucial to make intelligent answers. Top level numbers like you posted on here in an earlier post are not reliable quantifiers. If you cannot answer these questions intelligently and in some depth then I know you don’t know jack about quantifying military strength by modern methods of analysis which is the standard practice to make as accurate as possible a statistically proven measure of performance. Then I will not answer you or any post you make. I will coldly ignore you.
It doesn’t look good for you if cannot identify what a Frog is. A very popular piece of Cold War hardware that nearly any Cold War grunt should know and ID easily. Any person who is credible in military strength assessments should be able to talk about these things in basic terms.
Please, lay off the BS and post some sources for your bizarre claims and why post 28 isn’t accurate.
You have offered no explanation for your bizarre utterings for instance that NATO is dissolving and NATO nations are considering aligning with Russia, you cannot challenge to to what you learned in post 28, no explanation of why the Russian army today is more powerful than the Soviet Army of the 1980s, no explanation of your claim that Poland has become so powerful that it is not interested in the US and is breaking off on their, you just keep spewing silly stuff with no explanation, stuff that just isn’t even real.