“Had someone stuck a new primer in their you would have a point. As this was a souvenire spent caseing I can’t imagine that was the case. Without a primer what potential danger do you see?”
Put yourself in the school’s place: they probably weren’t gun experts and had know way of knowing that, or any of the other detailed information provided here. They only saw a seven year old with ammunition of unknown pedigree or origin (as stated in one image).
In an age of school violence and parental stupidity, they did the right thing by enforcing their own written policy.
You are arguing that the lowest level of knowledge and intelligence should set the rules of conduct for us all. Very Progressive!
So, instead of just confiscating the item and confirming whether or not it presents any danger, and then upon finding it’s no danger, return it to the boy, they initiate a “zero tolerance” response?
Sounds like a real rational administration there...but I bet they were out front and center patting themselves on the back. Telling the cameras how they did such a good job “protecting” their students...
A bunch of panty waisted, know nothing “educators” who can’t or won’t take the time to EDUCATE themselves on something.
Ignorance can be cured, stupid is forever...folks like this insist on remaining stupid because there’s no work or effort involved in remaining stupid but there is in dispelling ignorance.