Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gabby Giffords gets mean
Politico ^ | September 21, 2014 | Alex Isenstadt

Posted on 09/21/2014 5:51:52 PM PDT by Second Amendment First

Gabby Giffords, irreproachable figure of sympathy, has fashioned an improbable new role for herself this election year: ruthless attack dog.

The former Democratic congresswoman, whose recovery from a gunshot wound to the head captivated the country, has unleashed some of the nastiest ads of the campaign season, going after GOP candidates in Arizona and New Hampshire with attacks even some left-leaning commentators say go too far. And Republicans on the receiving end are largely helpless to hit back, knowing a fight with the much-admired survivor is not one they’re likely to win.

Some of the toughest spots from Giffords’ newly formed pro-gun-control super PAC, Americans for Responsible Solutions, hammer Republican Martha McSally, a retired Air Force pilot who is running for the Arizona seat Giffords once held. One features a wrenching testimonial from a woman named Vicki who weeps and stumbles over her words as she recounts how her 19-year-old daughter was hunted down and murdered by an enraged ex-boyfriend.

(PHOTOS: Gabrielle Giffords’ congressional career)

“He had threatened her before. I knew. I just knew,” Vicki says. A narrator then declares that McSally “opposes making it harder for stalkers to get a gun.”

It’s no accident that Giffords is singling out McSally, people close to the former congresswoman say.

During her unsuccessful 2012 campaign, McSally ran TV commercials comparing herself to Giffords. The Giffords team fumed, and her husband, retired astronaut Mark Kelly, released a terse statement declaring, “Martha McSally is no Gabby Giffords.”

Another anti-McSally ad features a woman named Carol who says her daughter was killed by a criminal who bought a firearm at a gun show and didn’t receive a background check — a check, she states, that McSally would oppose.

(Also on POLITICO: Gabrielle Giffords’ ad push aims to aid successor)

“To McSally, it’s just politics,” Carol says as she clutches a picture of her deceased daughter. “To me, it’s personal.”

Giffords also is going after Marilinda Garcia, a New Hampshire congressional candidate who, viewers are told, has “strange ideas” on gun laws. Another GOP hopeful in the Granite State, Frank Guinta, is ripped for “support[ing] the loophole that lets stalkers buy guns without a background check, no questions asked.”

In a midterm cluttered with negative ads, many of them seemingly crafted with the same cookie-cutter approach, Giffords’ commercials stand out for their intensity. Vicki’s emotional display, for instance, is something rarely seen in political ads.

Giffords is launching her campaign in parts of the country that have been affected by high-profile incidents of gun violence.

(Full 2014 election results)

In the Arizona district, wounds from the 2011 shooting that nearly took Giffords’ life are never far from the surface. (The Democratic candidate, Rep. Ron Barber, a former Giffords staffer who succeeded her in Congress, was also wounded in the attack.) Her group also is considering running ads in a Colorado district that was home to the 2012 Aurora movie theater massacre and which neighbors Columbine High School, where a 1999 rampage took place.

Some longtime supporters are starting to cry foul.

On Friday, the Arizona Republic’s editorial page, which is typically liberal leaning, called the “Vicki” ad “base and vile.” The commercial, the newspaper said, put the murder “at McSally’s feet, as if she were responsible. A murder indictment implied. But, of course, McSally had nothing to do with” the death.

Giffords’ frustration with Washington’s failure to advance gun control legislation is playing out in her 2014 efforts.

(Also on POLITICO: Gabby Giffords, Mark Kelly ALS challenge Wayne LaPierre)

In the days following the December 2012 Newtown, Connecticut, school shooting, where 26 people lost their lives, she testified before Congress, telling senators that “too many children are dying.” On the day the Senate voted down a bill to expand background checks, she stood behind President Barack Obama in the Rose Garden as he told lawmakers their rejection was “shameful.” She would later write that she was “furious” over the vote.

Pia Carusone, a senior adviser to the super PAC, said the bill’s failure had been a setback for the former congresswoman but that Giffords viewed it as only “the start of turning a really big ship around.”

Carusone, who was Giffords’ chief of staff at the time she was shot, said Giffords is deeply involved in the making of the ads. The former congresswoman has been sorting through polling and taking part in conference calls with strategists. She’s also played a key role in fundraising, helping the group to raise more than $17 million. Giffords hasn’t personally appeared in the commercials aired so far, though she may star in future ones, aides say.

Giffords’ advisers deny the ads go overboard. They say they’re conscious of the former congresswoman’s sensitive image and, as a result, have been working to ensure that the commercials, while hard-hitting, don’t stray from fact. Not all of them have been negative. The group has begun running an ad praising Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick, a moderate Republican from the Philadelphia suburbs, for supporting expanded background checks.

(From POLITICO Magazine: Guns 'R' Us)

“We think about it in terms of making sure we never cross a line where it would be perceived as cheap, low blow or dirty,” Carusone said. “I don’t think you’ll see us ever do an ad that looks like a cheap attack ad.”

Republicans want to hit back, but it’s quite the conundrum going after Giffords.

Last week, McSally released a statement calling the ads “false and malicious” and “personally offensive,” revealing that she has been a victim of stalking. But the statement didn’t refer by name to Giffords or her super PAC, describing them only as “Congressman Barber’s political allies.”

Garcia also is pulling her punches. In a brief interview, she repeatedly declined to criticize the former congresswoman. Guinta didn’t respond to a request for comment.

It’s not the first time Republicans have struggled with how to deal with memories of the Arizona shooting. In 2012, the National Republican Congressional Committee undertook a research project to gauge how voters would respond to political attacks on Barber, who was shot twice in the attack.

Giffords’ bare-knuckled approach isn’t entirely out of character.

(Also on POLITICO: Remembering James S. Brady)

The Democrat proved herself to be a tough campaigner during her five years in the House. She wasn’t afraid to harshly attack her Republican foes in order to keep her hold on a swing district that hugs Arizona’s southern border.

In 2010, as Democrats across the country were swept away in a conservative wave, Giffords eked out a narrow, 4,156-vote victory over a GOP opponent, Jesse Kelly, by casting him as fringe and dangerous.

One particularly rough Giffords TV ad, which contended that Kelly would cut entitlement programs beloved by seniors, said the Republican was “more interested in greed and not interested in the rest of the population.”

“She was always an extremely pragmatic politician,” said Tom Zoellner, the author of a book about the Giffords shooting, “A Safeway in Arizona.” “She’s extremely smart, and she’s going to do what it takes to push her policy agenda.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; demattackdog; giffords
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

1 posted on 09/21/2014 5:51:53 PM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

“And Republicans on the receiving end are largely helpless to hit back, knowing a fight with the much-admired survivor is not one they’re likely to win. “

So drop out then, gutless RINOs.


2 posted on 09/21/2014 5:54:32 PM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Hint for Gabby.

Someone is point a gun at you, duck.

Your hubby should have told you that one.


3 posted on 09/21/2014 5:54:45 PM PDT by hadaclueonce (Because Brawndo's got electrolytes. Because Ethanol has Big Corn Lobby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Maybe mark kelley-giffords got one of her strings too tight.


4 posted on 09/21/2014 5:55:20 PM PDT by rktman ("The only thing dumber than a brood hen is a New York democrat." Mother Abagail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

The next DWS?


5 posted on 09/21/2014 5:55:22 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Thank you for self-censoring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
And Republicans on the receiving end are largely helpless to hit back,

....as usual.

6 posted on 09/21/2014 5:57:27 PM PDT by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

“He had threatened her before. I knew. I just knew,” Vicki says. A narrator then declares that McSally “opposes making it harder for stalkers to get a gun.”

...

Enraged stalkers would never dream of using a knife, car, or blunt object.


7 posted on 09/21/2014 5:58:16 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Ann Coulter vindicated.


8 posted on 09/21/2014 5:59:37 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Remember who her best gal pal was when she was in the House ... Debbie Dipsh!t! She hasn’t changed, just a little slower on the drawl!


9 posted on 09/21/2014 6:00:51 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Every trash can has a lid, the DNC lid is Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (aka Debbie Dipsh!t))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

James Brady. Gabby Giffords. Ain’t it funny how two of the most prominent anti-gunners are provably profoundly brain-damaged? Makes you wonder about the rest of them.


10 posted on 09/21/2014 6:01:13 PM PDT by Flatus I. Maximus (First Third-World Despotism. Overthrow Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hadaclueonce

We’ve been there before.Sarah Brady, wife of former Reagan Press Secretary Jim Brady, spent the rest of her husbands life in the lucrative anti gun movement.


11 posted on 09/21/2014 6:02:01 PM PDT by billhilly (Its OK, the left hated Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

The harlot Giffords was a mean one before she got shot; imperious and contemptuous of her constituants. I wonder if the stalking boyfriend would have been on the street if the court had been responsible? He could have stolen a car, obtsained any number of controlled and / or illegal substances, used a knife and the list goes on but Giffords brays on. Personally, I wish Laughner had been a better shot or used a bigger gun.


12 posted on 09/21/2014 6:02:17 PM PDT by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I won’t say what I’m thinking.

Damn it’s hard not to, but I won’t.......

HOLLOW POINTS....GRRR.....


13 posted on 09/21/2014 6:02:55 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Not a surprise. The whole business was one big lie—the press and a lying sheriff pretending that a crazy leftist was set on her by a passing remark by Sarah Palin.

And she has gone along with the whole propaganda campaign.


14 posted on 09/21/2014 6:03:13 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BookmanTheJanitor

They love to bow to the victim mentality.

Are RINOs pathetically guilt ridden and in love with the victim mentality too?

Explains the tears of drunk Boehner.


15 posted on 09/21/2014 6:04:35 PM PDT by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I am ‘sorry’ she got shot etc

BUT they could march her around the country like an extra from “Weekend at Bernies” and keep propping her up etc and if they decided to run her for pResident, the dummies would fall all over themselves to vote for her.

All knew what a ‘witch’ Hillary could be/was and when Lazio walked across the stage one would think he punched her out.

Actually, in a one on one I am not so sure she wouldn’t take him out.


16 posted on 09/21/2014 6:04:45 PM PDT by xrmusn ((6/98) Free people are not equal. Equal people are not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

“And Republicans on the receiving end are largely helpless to hit back, knowing a fight with the much-admired survivor is not one they’re likely to win.”

If this is true, that Repub’s can’t handle this fight, I am shocked at their lack of political knowledge. This is textbook, politics 101, you simply come back with an ad that features an elderly person, a woman, or a teenager, who saved their life or the life of a family member because they were able to defend themself against a bigger, nasty criminal by having access to a gun. Especially, if you have a woman who defended herself against a mean ex-boyfriend. That is just the message to counter the attack. It is simple, it is politics 101.

If you can’t handle these kinds of attacks, then you can’t run a political campaign in 2014. We are in an era when the Stalinist left feels it has an open road to all their desires. They have taken the strategy of running official victims (race, affliction, point of view) for office because they assume those official victims cannot be criticized in a campaign. Any opponent must simply ignore that strategy or the opponent will defeat him or herself.


17 posted on 09/21/2014 6:09:42 PM PDT by iacovatx (Conservatism is the political center--it is not "right" of center)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

It’s very easy to hit back against ads like the first one mentioned, find a person with an alternative story and tell it.

PUNCH BACK TWICE AS HARD.

We all knew her husband was a sanctimonious b*tch, too bad she is too.


18 posted on 09/21/2014 6:10:51 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Claim: Mark Kelly purchased an AR-15 rifle the day after testifying to Colorado legislators about the need for additional gun control measures.

TRUE

Read more at snopes.com

They can rationalize all they want, but even lefty-slurpees like Snopes know the truth about Mr. and Mrs. Gabby: “Firearms for me, but not for thee.”

Ad hominem tu quoque? (literally: “You also”) refers to a claim that the source making the argument has spoken or acted in a way inconsistent with the argument.

Who cares?
Their actions show them to be phonies, like algore, his 52” inseam lifestyle and glowbull warming.

Hands off the Bill of Rights!


19 posted on 09/21/2014 6:12:31 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Gabby Giffords and her ultra ambitious husband are and always have been political hacks and grifters first and foremost.

Good old Gabby was shot a public meting she had scheduled to kick off her charm offensive to repair the damage, anger and wrath she incurred with voters in her hyper partisan support in ramming Obama and the Democrats radical agenda down the throats of Arizona voters.

She and hubby needs to shut up and go away but fat chance of that when they are living off the donations of her Gun Control PAC.

20 posted on 09/21/2014 6:12:45 PM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson