Then again, the islamists blew up two buildings on 9/11, and there wasn't much of a reaction here in the homeland (except for TSA patdowns of old women).
So I would expect more of the same under your scenario. And Obama and Holder would move swiftly to suppress any public unrest.
Here's the rule:
Angry protests against the police - encouraged!
Angry protests against islamists - forbidden!
You could be right about regime crackdowns against protests against Islam (muzzies are a protected class).
Except......
1. That could produce a popular backlash (the so-called “Bubba Effect” especially in the South.
2. Most people have never set foot in a skyscraper building. But millions ride in buses. Knowing that public transportation is a muzzie target would bring the terrorist threat home to millions of people.
3. The ISIS atrocities are awakening more & more of us to the sheer fact that ISIS is not an aberration of Islam, but its full stinking flower in bloom. ISIS terrorists are not only Islamic, but the purest of Muslims according to the Koran.
4. Gun ownership & CCW’s are proliferating, not as a direct reaction to Islamic terrorism, but out of fear that the regime will start confiscating guns (which is exactly what Obamabots want to do, but have been stymied by that little speed bump known as the U.S. Constitution). The net effect upon domestic muzzie terrorism is the actualization of `Yamamoto’s nightmare’ (”there will be a rifle behind every blade of grass”).
5. Should every identifiable Muslim in America be regarded as a terrorist enabler/cheerleader? I’m not sure; they will have to answer that question.