Conversely if you choose to not support the RINO you are supporting the Marxist by default. If that is my two choices, I choose the slow road to hell rather than the express. Maybe we can save the country in the meantime.
Obviously we would both choose a principled conservative if we had that option.
Meaningful differences between Myth Romney and Obozo on issues that really matter (not $$$$ issues for the ruling class), differences on gun grabbing, baby-killing, marriage destruction, military, foreign policy, job creation, simply do not exist. With Obozo, you get Marxism inflicted on everyone. Under Romney, you get Marxism imposed upon everyone but his peers in the upper upper upper class.
Muffie's trust fund is not an issue over which to wage war. We will get to the Demonrats when we are ready for that war. Meanwhile, we prepare for that war by eliminating the greedheads who buy Republican nominations, within the party or by destroying the GOP with a new party. The Myth Romneys and the Thurston Howells can lead (in a broad conservative direction on ALL issues), follow or get the hell out of the way. If they do not surrender soon, then we should add their hard financial punishment to the litany of conservative issues that must be pursued. If they keep on waging class warfare against conservatives, then they have no complaint coming when conservatives respond in kind against them.
You do not have principled conservative options because of the obscene amounts of money that the pampered princes of privilege carpetbombing the airwaves with lies, propaganda and other ads.
We need to exclude all but at least one year registered Republicans from voting in GOP primaries, and develop a consciousness among GOP voters that the expenditure of obscene amounts of privileged cash on behalf of the hopelessly RINO greedheads should be seen as the moral equivalent of mass child molesting. People must be induced to say: I shall never vote for someone like Romney whose only qualification is spending other people's money. Where did it come from and what did he promise in order to receive it? As to my vote, now or ever, NO SALE!
According to your absence of logic, not voting RINO means voting Marxist by default. I also did not vote for Obozo. Does that mean that I voted RINO by default? in that event, according to you, by voting neither RINO nor Marxist, I voted both RINO and Marxist. You are one seriously confused dude. Neither I nor anyone else owe our vote to any political party that sees fit to nominate candidates who are beneath contempt, lower than whale sh*t.
Edit:
I typed out a long and factually accurate response and then realized it wasn’t worth the time. I am talking to a complete kool aid addict. So I will respond in the most appropriate way possible.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0&feature=youtu.be
“Obviously we would both choose a principled conservative if we had that option. “
Can’t let this slide either.
No you wouldn’t. You didn’t. The very utterance and posting of your philosophy eliminates voting for one. Nearly every RINO has someone running against them more conservative. And the astronomically rare one that does not still has a ballot with a write in.
Your fellows have had 39ish years to prove you’d vote for the more conservative candidate, yet here we are with the most liberal congress to ever pollute the GOP. You wanna explain how that happened considering almost all of them had a more conservative opponent in the primary and/or the general?
Are we to believe that in 30 years, no conservatives ran?
No. What happened was situational ethics reared its head and conservative principles got kicked in the face so a bunch of closeted democrats could WIN!!!! for the sake of winning. Not win to make a positive difference. No, just to claim bragging rights.
You and yours had a number of far more conservative candidates on the primary ballots than Mitt Romney. And they were on those ballots in the 50 American states and likely the 7 more Barry added. Unsurprising the “I’m conservative...really!” crew didn’t vote for them. they voted for Mitt “Less conservative than Obama” Romney (Even Barry opposed homo marriage once...Mitt never did).
So that’s an outright lie. You didn’t. Mitt lost as we said he would. Instead of a conservative, the Cheshires pushed a liberal in the primaries, got him and lost.
Now if I am mistaken, please tell me how your statement holds true when actual conservatives stayed true to principle? How did Mitt end up a candidate?