Unlike others on this thread, I’m addressing specifically what the article says.
If the author is wrong in his arguments, why not show where and how? Instead of extended ad hominem attacks.
I’ve always figured 75 was about long enough too. My mom says 73. My grandpa decided 80 was it, and used a shotgun.
A principled position. Let me ask ... if you read an article where 0bama said ... 'If you like your health plan, you can keep your health plan' ... would you take him at his word?
I don't give Zeke Emmanuel any more credibility than I do 0bama ... and with good reason.