Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: I still care

There is absolutely nothing to conclude that Richard was thought “evil” in his time because he may or may not have had a raised shoulder - this is a cliché about a time that was really much more sophisticated than commonly thought. In fact, the brilliance of the nobility and royalty is quite remarkable. The more I read about them the more I’m impressed with their genius.

There are no contemporary accounts of Richard being deformed. In fact, the reconstruction of his face shows a quite comely individual. His physique is considered gracile. He was small and fine boned. He was a fierce warrior who preferred a battle ax to any other weapon. He was also a fine horseman.


56 posted on 09/17/2014 3:25:35 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard III: Loyalty Binds Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: miss marmelstein

Hey, I’m not going to wade into the “Richard was painted a villain by history” thing. People feel too strongly about it.

What I said was that he had a severe scoliosis, and that such things were very difficult to hide, with the level of court intrigue. It was a vicious time and at that level real schemers use everything they can to do all the damage they can - and no one will say the Tudors weren’t schemers. Heck, they killed him, didn’t they? Now what people thought of him at the time we’ll probably really never know.


81 posted on 09/17/2014 7:52:46 PM PDT by I still care (I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson