Posted on 09/17/2014 5:08:34 AM PDT by sunmars
Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper ties former U. S. Rep. Bob Beauprez, the Republican challenger, among women and trails among all likely voters 50 40 percent, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. Libertarian candidate Matthew Hess and Green Party candidate Harry Hempy each have 3 percent.
Women likely voters are divided, with 46 percent for Gov. Hickenlooper and 47 percent for Beauprez, while men back the Republican 54 34 percent, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University poll finds. This survey of likely voters can not be compared with earlier surveys of registered voters.
Beauprez leads 89 5 percent among Republicans and 50 37 percent among independent voters, while Hickenlooper takes Democrats 93 4 percent.
Their mind is made up, 77 percent of Colorado likely voters say, while 22 percent say they could change their mind in the next seven weeks.
With Hess out of the race, the results among likely voters are 52 percent for Beauprez, 40 percent for Hickenlooper and 3 percent for Hempy.
(Excerpt) Read more at quinnipiac.edu ...
In Colo. we have good candidates for Gov. and Senate.
Finally some good news...
Finally some good news...
Yes, it is good news. The key will be getting out the vote.
I hope some won’t sit home because Gardner and Beauprez aren’t “pure” enough.
Gaylon Kent looks like a good replacement for udal.
Matthew Hess looks like my voter for Governor.
These guys are both Libertarians and have not been caught in scandal.
Whatever you say.
Hannity just said that udal is 2 poin
“2 poin “ is pretty close. One way or the other.
I swear---it's a dam shame Democrat Senate candidates ARE NOT beneficiaries of Obama's delay on immigration reform. The White House ding-a-lings assured Democrats the delaying tactic would help Senate candidates---b/c the delay stops the use of immigration as a grandstanding issue.
OTOH, Latino pressure groups are incensed about Obama's reneging.
====================================================
News outlets report that Obama's delaying action on immigration reform was calculated to help nervous Democrats in tight Senate races The WH said delaying amnesty would help Democrats keep control of the Senate......and prevent a powerless Obama from swinging in the wind.
===============================================
REALITY CHECK.......a tsunami of 2014 voter polls indicate massive voter revulsion for Democrats---a decisive vote of "no confidence." So much so that Democrats, themselves, forced Obama to delay his plan to E/O amnesty---hoping to stave off disaster to protect uneasy Democrats from voter wrath in November.....
But Democrat Rep. Luis Gutierrez (Dem-Ill), the leading mouthpiece for amnesty, isn't taking Obama's dismissal lying down. Gutierrez said the Congressional Hispanic Caucus will meet to determine a formal response....and seemed to issue a veiled threat to the ambitions of vulnerable Democrats like Colorado Senate candidates.
GUTIERREZ: No more excuses, I dont care what senator is dangling in the wind, I dont care what Republican proposal is being made, he said. I dont care what happens. We are moving forward.
Democrat Senate candidates NEED TO DETERMINE WHETHER GUTIERREZ IS PLOTTING A COUP AGAINST DEMOCRATS?---his mouthings sound dangerously like a latino threat to vulnerable Democrats.
Question is: are Democrat Senate candidates who have been so loyal going to allow Gutierrez to threaten their re/elections?
Senate candidates need to get cracking and demand to know the details
about an individual threatening Senate candidates. For instance:
<><><> the number of identities Gutierrez is using now, or has ever used (driving a cab in Illinois);
<><><> the number of US govt check Gutierrez, his family, and his staff are cashing;
<><><> whether Gutierrez has ever been labled a ntl security threat; <><><> whether Gutierrez used infamous crooked Chicago tactics to get elected;
<><><> the list of his memberships in violent latino groups advocating the overthrow of the US govt;
<><> How many stolen Social Security numbers are his family, staff and political entourage using?
<><><> how many identities are the Guiterrez family and campaign entourage using?
<><><> are his family, supporters, and political entourage paid agents of foreign governments?
WHO IS GIVING GUTIERREZ HIS MARCHING ORDERS? Democrats need to get the FBI to subpoena Gutierrez's phone records, emails and snail mail, wire transfers, etc .....
<><> Examine his campaign contributors, foreign travel;
<><> did Gutierrez employ foreign agents as staff w/ US tax dollars?
<><> did Gutierrez ever file falsified documents w/ the federal government?
<><> did he ever make false statements on tax returns?
<><> did he ever apply for EITC refunds listing children "back Home" that are not related to him?
<><> does he earn outside income as a paid political consultant to foreign governments?
<><> did Gutierrez fail to register as an agent of a foreign government;
<><> Is Gutierrez and The Congressional Hispanic Caucus using tax dollars to conduct a coup against Democrats.
=================================================
FBI TIPS PAGE---https://tips.fbi.gov
<><> Senate candidates should demand Gutierrez, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, La Raza, and other tax-funded latino pressure groups, be investigated.
L/E should supboena Gutierrez' official filings, phone records, emails, snail mail copies, hard drives, bank accounts, checking accounts, credit cards, debit cards, wire transfers, social media contacts, and the like.
==================================================
Senate candidates should demand to know who these people are communicating with, and who is directing their activities against Democrats.
Senate candidates should demand to know if Gutierrez, his staff, The Congressional Hispanic caucus, are colluding to dump Democrats, and whether they are consorting with violent organizations to overthrow the Democrat Party unless they get their way.
Hannity said udal is 2 points behind.
Suffolk University Poll of CO Senate Race: Gardner (R) 43% Udall (D) 42%
Suffolk University | September 17, 2014
Posted on 9/17/2014 4:13:58 PM by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3205067/posts
I guess vista edited the post.
How can that happen? Sorry, I’ve never heard of that before.
It seems to have dropped off the last letters of what I wrote.
CO Senate Race: Gardner (R) 43% Udall (D) 42%.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3205067/posts
Nice
Thanks
Awesome!
NPR’s Marketplace Show which purports to be a business program, recently covered money in politics. They said the Koch Brothers about a dozen times and mentioned not a single big Democrat donor - billionaires all. We’re naïve to believe the MSM isn’t the propaganda arm of the DNC.
If the GOP controls Congress and cannot reduce NPR’s funding and end the tax loopholes available to the media, then they’re fools.
If you vote for a loser, you’re voting for the winner by default. Don’t pretend that you’re wrapping yourself in the moral high ground. You have to pick the most conservative potential winner if you want to play ball.
I voted for Dole. I voted for Sarah and the RHINO that came with her. I held my nose and voted for Romney. Last governors race the republicans ran an unelectable goof. I am not responsible for the poor decisions of the republicans. Republicans hate conservatives like me. Two polls said that there were 20% liberal and 40% conservative. Republicans hate conservatives. Libertarians embrace my ideas. One of the flags at bunker hill said Liberty, Unity. The republicans are neither.
Well thank God. That is the first poll to show Gardner ahead. There is another out today that shows Gardner up by 8 points.
Hopefully, this a strong tend.
The 48-40 Gardner lead among likely voters in The Quinnipiac University Poll
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3205294/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.