Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dagnabitt

[ I’m just saying that the Space Shuttle disasters will likely have an impact on how the NASA chiefs view their next choice. ]

I would even say that non-reusable capsules would be the best choice...

They are simple, could be stamped out quickly and remeber that they basically re-built the damned shuttle bvefore each mission anyways!

Maybe make the capsules so that your aviaonics and other expensive components can be pulled out, tested and then slotted into a fresh capsule each time with plenty of spares available. But the capsule itself and heat shield are all new each and every time and make assembly line fashion.

Unless you make your reusable space craft truly reusable with a minimum needs for maintainence between each flight you are wasting money have to rebuild the supposedly reusable craft each and every dang time...


104 posted on 09/17/2014 10:33:05 AM PDT by GraceG (No, My Initials are not A.B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: GraceG

We can build reusable spacecraft that do not require cost prohibitive refurbishment between missions.


129 posted on 09/21/2014 8:48:24 AM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson