First, what is their supposed basis for claim? They should not have standing.
Second, what law or regulation says that the websites didn’t use all required caution in dealing with their customers? If the websites are compliant, the lawsuit is frivolous.
Third, what in the world makes these people believe they have the right to prevent others from accessing a legal product in a legal manner?
Please allow me to add a fourth.
Fourth, what damage/injury was caused to the Brady Center?
Gwjack