I don’t understand why we keep having lawsuits over voter ID laws when the Supreme Court has already upheld such a law.
Does the concept of legal precedent only apply in cases which are approved of by liberals? What the heck is happening?
because they attempt to argue it from different angles. laws that have differences, they try to argue the differences. or attempt to declare it invalid for a different reason other than what was in the previous case.
splitting hairs essentially.
Voter ID makes it more difficult to commit voter fraud.That is reason enough for liberals,socialists, and Democrats to oppose it. Yes, I know that was three names for one group of people.