Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
So, she thinks that unconstitutional judicial activism is just fine as long as it's done incrementally.

If you look at her votes there doesn't appear to be anything incremental about them. She would have voted with the majority at the time for Roe vs Wade.

12 posted on 09/11/2014 12:09:27 PM PDT by Starstruck (If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Starstruck
She would have voted with the majority at the time for Roe vs Wade.

But probably written her own opinion about how ever Roe is too "restrictive" and that killing 4000 babies a day just isn't good enough.

16 posted on 09/11/2014 12:11:19 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson