Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o
He’s not using her own eggs.

Hmmm,missed that.It still might be at least a bit dangerous for a woman that age to be pregnant.But,again,a physician might disagree.

51 posted on 09/10/2014 11:28:40 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Islamopobia:The Irrational Fear Of Being Beheaded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative
They have to shoot her up with synthetic hormones to produce a chronically abnormal blood hormonal profile, as least as long as pregnancy and longer, probably, if she wants to nurse.

So, elevated risk to the mother, yeah. All of the gynecological cancers are hormone-sensitive.

And as for the babies? Elevated risk as well. There's FIVE TIMES the risk of complications for the babies.

Why doesn't she adopt?

Why doesn't she get MARRIED, for heaven's sake? That is the FIRST responsibility of a person who wants to be a parent.

One of the most persistent fantasies of these detached-from-reality mothers: that kids don't need a father.

66 posted on 09/10/2014 12:18:09 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (He comes to judge the living and the dead, and the world by fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson