Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H

“Nice to see such respect for the 10th Amendment on this thread... < /s>”

The Code of Federal Regulations trumps the 10th Amendment. And believe it or not, the FDA is on the public’s side.

The FDA was created to enforce the Pure Food & Drug Act of 1906 which protects you, the consumer, from “the manufacture, sale, or transportation of adulterated or misbranded or poisonous or deleterious foods, drugs, medicines, and liquors, and for regulating traffic therein, and for other purposes.”

http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/legislation/ucm148690.htm

All I ask is that medical marijuana be regulated just like any other medicines. Otherwise it falls into the same “patent medicine” category that led to the creation of the FDA and government regulations in the first place.

Can’t have it both ways.


44 posted on 09/08/2014 10:12:14 AM PDT by RaveOn ("No amount of logic can shatter a faith consciously based on a lie." Lamar Keene, "True Believers")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: RaveOn
The Code of Federal Regulations trumps the 10th Amendment.

I am uncertain whether you referring to case law, or to your view of what is legitimate under the Constitution. According to case law, fedgov controls health care, education, the environment and a host of other things that were never intended.

You seem to be supporting the most egregious reaches of the New Deal Commerce Clause. A sharp line was drawn in the Raich case. Justice Stevens says =>

Thus the case for the exemption comes down to the claim that a locally cultivated product that is used domestically rather than sold on the open market is not subject to federal regulation. Given the findings in the CSA and the undisputed magnitude of the commercial market for marijuana, our decisions in Wickard v. Filburn and the later cases endorsing its reasoning foreclose that claim.

J. Stevens, Opinion of the Court

_______________________________________________________________

Justice Thomas says =>

Respondents Diane Monson and Angel Raich use marijuana that has never been bought or sold, that has never crossed state lines, and that has had no demonstrable effect on the national market for marijuana. If Congress can regulate this under the Commerce Clause, then it can regulate virtually anything–and the Federal Government is no longer one of limited and enumerated powers.

J. Thomas, dissenting

_______________________________________________________________

Which side do you support?

45 posted on 09/08/2014 7:06:36 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson