Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hal ogen

Plenty of Citizens who’s grades qualify them but who’s incomes can’t support the cost of attending UC system schools. They should be getting the aid first.


6 posted on 09/06/2014 6:49:48 AM PDT by sappy (criminaldems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: All
If UC is using tax-exempt education bond revenue to finance this squalid bunch, the IRS, SEC and Bank oversight agencies would be interested.

TAX-EXEMPT BOND OFFERINGS -- The SEC, IRS and bank oversight agencies, would be interested in possible Fraudulent Methods WRT misleading municipal bond offerings, perhaps defrauding investors by misleading them about use of tax-exempt revenue; using falsified marketing materials to mislead investors.

Is there a UC “Master Plan” that might describe certain fraudulent accounting adjustments pursued as part of a sub rosa scheme; engaging in fraudulent conduct to mislead WRT tax revenue, expenses, or payments; perhaps structuring transactions as "loan repayments" to falsify revenue.

Is there leveraging of tax dollars to secure bank loans that benefit principles? Perhaps classifying fraudulent withdrawals as revenue on official documents?

University accountants, Accounting firms and Legal entities could also be involved---every state has an agency to field complaints about the accounting and legal professions ....as well as a banking and insurance complaint agency.

You need to find out which banks are facilitating this deal.
Which banks are designated the repositories of education tax dollars?

REFERENCE SOURCE: web site / occ.gov

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency processes questions and complaints concerning consumer issues within the jurisdiction of the OCC through our Consumer Assistance Group (CAG) (and sends misdirected complaints to the appropriate federal or state regulator).

OCC processes complaints involving national banks and federal savings associations with more than $10 billion in assets on behalf of the CFPB, while the CFPB builds its capacity to handle complaints. Under this approach, the CFPB will begin by handling credit card related complaints involving national banks and federal savings associations with assets of $10 billion or more and will expand its complaint process to other products and services offered as the new bureau builds that capacity through March 2012.

Consumers can contact the bureau through its Web site, consumerfinance.gov, or by phone at 855-411-2372. Consumers may use the FFIEC site to identify a financial institution's primary regulator, or may use the FDIC institution directory to identify which institutions have more than $10 billon in assets.

For specific problems with a financial institution other than a national bank, contact the customer assistance:
(1) State Banking Department WRT a state bank
(2) Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), or,
(3) the Federal Reserve for federally chartered banks.

===================================================

COMMON FRAUD PRACTICES: Using municipal credit cards. Reversing credit card write-offs, initially writing off credit debt then cooking the municipal books by reversing the write-off for annual reports. The debt could also be carried on the municipal books as an unbilled disbursement "receivable."

Backdating checks to hide the date on which checks were received---in order to minimize the risk that auditors would discover WRT fraudulent accounting practices.

Reclassifying expenses on financial statements to seemingly reduce expenses. This change in treatment is usually not disclosed to auditors or on official financial state documents.

==============================================

All of these activities compel criminal penalties for the crimes of grand larceny, schemes to defraud, securities fraud and falsifying government records.

7 posted on 09/06/2014 6:57:27 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: sappy

My granddaughter is a US citizen who was raised in Costa Rica. She goes to San Diego State and had to pay out-of-state tuition for two years before they reluctantly granted her resident status. She did pay California income taxes for the two years she ‘wasn’t a resident’. Her tax paying made no difference. She was denied benefits open to foreign students and ‘Dreamers’.


17 posted on 09/06/2014 11:26:12 AM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson