Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

Libertarianism doesn’t necessarily mean weak foreign policy. Ultimately you can’t have liberty at home without a secure nation. I want the maximum amount of liberty at home, but with a government that’s vigorously defends our interest abroad. What I don’t want is getting involved where we have no national interest. I also agree with Paul here that nation building is moronic and doomed to failure over there.

Thomas Jefferson is a big hero to libertarians, he sent the navy to take out the sultan of Tripoli over attacks on American ships. And without a Declaration of War BTW.


28 posted on 09/04/2014 1:49:24 PM PDT by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Hugin

Ultimately you can’t have liberty at home without a secure nation.

You can’t have liberty at home if you’re always, ALWAYS at war. War is the most expensive enterprise government can engage in. It runs up deficits, debt, inflation, and grows the size of government more than anything else.

War is sometimes necessary, but if we’re always at war, kiss your freedoms - and your pocketbook - goodbye.


32 posted on 09/04/2014 2:00:17 PM PDT by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson