I used to teach artillery, and of course like many GI’s have given classes in simple weapons such as LAWs, the Ukrainians can use the weapons that we give them.
As far as you lying about “unilateral disarmament” Russia is no where near being a match for the United States, throw that in with Great Britain, France, Germany, the Czech Republic, Poland and the other 22 nations of NATO against Russia’s limited military with 766,000 personnel in all branches, and the question arises, what in the devil is your angle in spewing this nonsense?
Simple history. We need to BOMB Serbia to the STONE AGE to get them out of Kosovo and nearly go in with ground troops. We needed to BOMB the Serbs in Bosnia to get them to buckle. Dumping obsolete weapons on our allies didn’t do a damn thing to change the facts on the ground, and I’m not sure how happy the Russians will be when we start bombing them.
So what’s in it for you in starting WW3...more contract work maybe?
What was NATO’s original establish for???