We don’t have crap in Europe, and it’d take a couple of months to get a credible force there. Have the ships sailed yet?
NATO has plenty in Europe, what are you talking about?
“”The combined defense expenditures of all NATO nations in 2013 amounted to $1.02 trillion. This figure includes research and development expenditures related to purchase of major equipment and pensions.
By comparison, the total of military budgets for all countries in the world was $1.745 trillion in 2012, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute in Sweden.
In 2012, Chinas expenditures amounted to $166 billion and Russias were $90 billion. Iran trailed with just under $7 billion, according to SIPRI.
By troop numbers, NATO also held a lopsided advantage over any other nation, with a total of 3,370,000 servicemembers in 2013, according to NATOs statistics. This contrasts with Russias 766,000 troops and Chinas estimated 2.3 million active-duty personnel, according to Sam Perlo-Freeman, director of SIPRIs program on military expenditures.
NATO still accounts for a clear majority of world military spending, over 60 percent, and a substantial number of other top spenders are American allies like Saudi Arabia and Israel, Perlo-Freeman said. In terms of military capabilities, the U.S. and NATO will remain absolutely unmatched for the foreseeable future.
But Perlo-Freeman warned that although Chinas military capabilities are far, far shorter than Americas, it doesnt mean that Washington can impose its will in Chinas near-environment.
As for Russia, Perlo-Freeman said it could compare with the West only in its nuclear capabilities.
But its conventional forces have a lot of serious deficiencies in terms of command and control and mobility, (and) in terms of actually being able to fight modern warfare, they are far behind Western countries, he said.””