Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gay State Conservative
I would have to dig into some case law to probably find that one. I do know there is a Missouri case called Smith v. Harold's Supermarket, Inc., 685 S.W.2d 859 that addressed the usage of juvenile records in a wrongful death lawsuit where the juvenile had died. The court allowed the juvenile records in, Plaintiff (the juvenile's mom) appealed and lost.

The Court's basic reasoning was that the juvenile records were sealed in order to protect the juvenile: "the prohibition against use of juvenile court reports and records is for the exclusive protection of the juvenile and does not extend to any other person or proceeding which is neither occasioned by or brought against the juvenile."

Now, this was a wrongful death case, and the issue at hand was the "pecuniary worth of the juvenile" because they were trying to figure out the damages based on the potential future value of the juvenile's life. That being said, if the Missouri courts used the reasoning by the Missouri Court of Appeals in the Brown case, then it's plausible that juvenile records of the deceased may be open to disclosure since they would no longer technically exist to protect the juvenile.

I did a quick scan of the Missouri Statutes (Chapter 211 covers the juvenile courts) and didn't see anything in there that was on point. The disclosure of the Brown records would probably be argued from case law, and I would think any attorney trying to get them unsealed would rely on the Smith holding for sure. Nonetheless, I'm sure there are numerous other cases that deal with it. If I have some time this weekend, I'll poke around a bit.

128 posted on 08/29/2014 6:43:15 PM PDT by gopno1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: gopno1

bump
129 posted on 08/29/2014 6:47:27 PM PDT by GirlShortstop (Every person has a duty to seek and serve the truth. Abp Charles J. Chaput, OFMCap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

To: gopno1

I worked in the criminal records “department” of the US DoJ, and the rule on releasing information in regards to invading someone’s privacy was quite simple; DEAD MEN DON’T HAVE RIGHTS. We had to be very careful about releasing info, but once the subject was deceased, there were NO restrictions.


143 posted on 08/30/2014 10:06:14 AM PDT by Segovia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

To: gopno1

I’d be very interested in a ping when you post on that, please.


146 posted on 08/30/2014 10:40:03 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

To: gopno1

complaint is at the link


149 posted on 08/30/2014 12:25:30 PM PDT by rolling_stone (1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson