More has been done to advance human rights in the last century than was done in all of history leading up to it, yet during this period over ONE BILLION babies have been murdered in the womb.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
Because it’s OK to drink before an abortion, as it won’t cause any additional harm? /S
The same reason government forces me to wear a seat belt in my car but helmets on a motorcycle are optional.
Don’t smoke, don’t drink alcohol, don’t do drugs but it’s ok to cut them up and vacuum them out.
All the people I know with autistic children were teetotalers. Granted I have a limited data set, but it makes you wonder.
OH! You want to kill it.
Pardon us, we thought you just wanted to harm the baby.
The Canadian government run liquor stores are creepy. Hard to find and restricted and sterile.
Because it’s about what the woman WANTS. If you WANT it, it’s a baby and you shouldn’t hurt it. If you DON’T want it, it doesn’t matter what you do with ‘it’. If you change your mind anywhere along the process it immediately stops being a human baby and becomes an IT. It’s magic!
Great point.
I have used this argument for years. I will ask a pro-abort if it is ok for a pregnant woman to drink a quart of vodka every day. Of course not, they say. I ask why not, it’s HER body, right? Silence.
This is a great question for abortion advocates that defies logical explanation.
Make ya wonder don’t it?
Straight out of Seinfeld where Elaine warns the pregnant fortune teller not to drink and in another episode advocates vehemently for abortion rights. What a @!!! hypocrite!@!!!
Those disgusting anti-smoking commercials, which they insist on showing at dinner time, also warn against smoking while pregnant.
That argument will not carry much weight with the pro abort crowd
They would tell you that in one case it’s about taking care of something you want, while in the other case it’s getting rid of something you don’t want. So from their perspective it makes perfect sense.
The essence of the anti abortion case is that the conceived being inside the uterus is a human being. Only convincing the other side of that can win the case. Everything else is quite irrelevant.