Replies

.

I don't religiously follow either NASCAR, the NFL, English Soccer or Global Warming.

I, like most other (normal) people "have a life", that's usually pretty busy.

Newt Gingrich (and most "normal" people) is in the same position.

You state that by 1998 "all the evidence (against global warming) was overwhelming".

Bravo Sierra. FUBAR. Horsehocky.

The "fact" is that I'm a fairly well read guy ... and I've never even heard of the "OSIM Group" ...

or (with all due respect) "Dr. Robinson".

Cisero, if it ain't "widely published" ...

or only known by a small circle of people ... WITH ACCESS TO THE DATA ...

it's still basically a "SECRET" to most "normal" people.

"No One" (not even you, Carry_Okie)can accurately keep track of ALL business, literary, political, technology, science and economic information 23/7/365.

On the other hand, maybe you "are" indeed (in your own arrogant mind) the "one" exception to the rule.

So ... let's all offer a (kosher) Champagne Toast to ....

drum roll ...

Free Republic's "Carry_Okie" ....

.

I, like most other (normal) people "have a life", that's usually pretty busy. Newt Gingrich (and most "normal" people) is in the same position.

Mr. Gingrich is in a position for which he is handsomely compensated for the purpose of making decisions for his constituents. For you to claim that it is legitimate that he be misinformed about the principal rationale for the primary means of financing an unconstitutional tax on the American people as a funding mechanism for global governance is an appalling use of bogus rhetoric.

Bravo Sierra. FUBAR. Horsehocky.

First you claim the legitimacy of your ignorance and then you play that one?

Good grief. If you weren't such a stupid loudmouth I wouldn't bother at all.

Cisero, if it ain't "widely published" ...

Dr. Robinson's site is well enough published that by the year 2002 there were 49,000 scientists and engineers who were signatories of his climate petition.

it's still basically a "SECRET" to most "normal" people.

Taking pride in being a low-information voter isn't a debate tactic that will get you much, especially here.